Clan Knowles TM

Knowles, Ó Tnúthghail, Newell Genealogy
Ireland, England, Canada, Australia, America, Bahamas,

Home Page
Contact Us 
Coat of Arms
Message Board
Surname Distribution
Surname History
Knowles in Ireland 
Knowles in England 
1881 Census
Irish Records
Morrow Family
County Kildare
Ireland Property 
Passenger Lists
Knowles in the Carribean
American Revolution
Research Tips
Contact Us

Links Below:

Clan Henebry
Dunn Sept
Clan Magner

Today in Gaelic is


Knowles Family in Ireland
Ó Tnúthghail (longing-valour) 


The ancient Gaelic septs of County Kildare were descended from Cathaoir Mor, King of Ireland, who died in 122 AD.  One of the four major septs of Kildare were the Ui Ciardha (O’Careys/O’Kearys), who had lands in North Kildare around the present day barony of Carbury. The territory was named Cairbre (Carbury), after one of the seven sons of Niall of the Nine Hostages, who was king of Ireland at the end of the fourth century. 

Near the territory of the O'Carey's lived the native Gaelic O'Tnuthghail Sept of  North County Kildare who sometimes anglicized their name as Knowles as well as the more usual Newell.

The first Irish were neolithic users of flint and then bronze.  About 350, the Gaelic Celts from southern France and Spain conquered Ireland.  The Celtic traditions and culture have held on longer in Ireland than any other country, and the Vikings and Normans became absorbed into the Gaelic world.   Bibliography

The difficulty with establishing an Irish pedigree is that the Central Repository of Ireland's Public Records was set on fire and burned in 1922.  The main bulk of the State, Domestic and Ecclesiastical Records of the country were then destroyed.

     The name Knowles in Ireland is often of immigrant origin having been brought into the country by settlers who arrived into the Province of Ulster, especially during the seventeenth century. The Cappoge Castle in the parish of Castleknock, County Dublin had been forfeited after the rebellion by Bartholomew Dillon, and the chief inhabitants on the lands after the Restoration were Captain Knowles and Henry Wood, whose house was assessed for two hearths. At the time of the Restoration (1660-1666) the inhabitants numbered four of English and 22 of Irish descent. 

The current Irish Golden Pages listings for Knowles by county: 
  Meath=33, Kildare=40, Cork=13 and Dublin=31.

Dublin City Directory for the year 1850:
     Knowles, Richard, 58 Thomas St. (victualler)

1890 Distribution of Births for Knowles

Leinster 7
Munster 1
Connacht 0
Ulster 5


Number of Knowles households from the Ireland Primary Valuation property survey of 1848-1864.  

Antrim 25 Kildare 11
Armagh 1 Kilkenny 2
Belfast City 2 Laois 19
Cavan 3 Limerick City 1
Cork 14 Longford 1
Cork City 1 Louth 4
Derry 1 Meath 4
Dublin 3 Tyrone 1
Dublin City 2    


Knowles, Henry        Age : 45        Country of Origin : Ireland 
Date of Arrival : Oct. 4, 1851        Final Destination : USA  
Gender : Male        Occupation : Laborer      
Port of Debarkation : New York        Ship's Name : Idas   
Manifest ID Number : 5620        Port of Embarkation : Dublin       
Purpose for Travel : Unknown        Mode of Travel : Unknown

There were 223 listings for Knowles surname in the
2004 Eircom phone book, Golden Pages.  This
does not include Northern Ireland.

Cork 14 Cavan 3
Clare 3 Donegal 1
Cork 14 Dublin 39
Kerry 1 Kildare 51
Laois 6 Louth 2
Limerick 2 Tipperary 3
Wexford 3 Wicklow 44


Buried in the Clonbeg Church graveyard near Newton in the Glen of Aherlow.   Dean & Rector:  Dr. Philip N. Knowles: The Deanery, Cashel, Ireland.

 "Sacred to the memory of Thomas Henebry of Drumleigh who dept'd this life the 23 of June 1843 aged 63 years also his son Thomas dept 19 dec 1843 aged 23 years.  Erected by his son James Henebry for them & posterity." "To the memory of William Henebry of Kilscanlen Who dept this life the 13th of April 1830 aged 70 yrs.  Erected by his sons David, Michael & James Henebry for him & their posterity.  May he rest in peace."

In memory of Henry B. Knowles of Dublin.
  Killed on Wednesday, April 26, 1916
 During the Easter Rising.

    For more information on the death of Henry see the book; Dublin 1916 by Roger McHugh.


On Wednesday, April 26th 1916 Henry B. Knowles left his house at no. 6 West Essex St. Dublin.

That evening his family became anxious when he did not return home at his usual time.  His wife, Arabella,  was told by a neighbor that there had been quite a few men killed that day and that Mr. Knowles was among them.  "I knew young Knowles who was murdered in 27 North King street.  Mrs. Hughes and I both saw the feather bed burning over their grave in the yard."  (statement of Mrs. Ellen Walsh whose husband was also murdered at 172 North King Street)

Henry's youngest son Thomas  went out in search of him.

Henry had been shot in the abdomen, and had been brought with the other dead to the dispensary at Castle St. and here he was laid out in the back yard.

Thomas climbed over the dispensary wall and into the yard and had to search among the dead bodies for his father. 

(See the book Dublin 1916 by Roger McHugh, London, Arlington Books, 1966, p. 234 which contains a reference to the shooting of Henry Knowles)

      webmaster:  Ronald Magner Knowles


Source:  The Irish Times front page:  Thursday, January 11, 2001 

Files confirm unarmed civilians shot in 1916

From Rachel Donnelly, in London

"Unarmed civilians and "Irish rebels" were shot during the 1916 Easter Rising on British orders not to take prisoners, according to War Office files released at the Public Record Office in London yesterday.

The files, which were closed under the 100-year rule but revealed now as part of Labour's policy of open government, provide details of soldiers shooting civilians, suspected of taking part in the Rising, without trial.

In a report written in June 1916 to the then Prime Minister, Herbert Asquith, the permanent secretary to the Home Department, Sir Edward Troup, observed that the source of "mischief" was the military order not to take prisoners. "This in itself may have been justifiable - but it should have been made clear that it did not mean that an unarmed rebel might be shot after he had been taken prisoner . . . still less could it mean that a person taken on mere suspicion could be shot without trial."

Sir Edward also referred to the shooting of James Moore outside a house in Little Brittain Street in Dublin. Moore was killed by a shot fired by a group of British soldiers in the street, but the soldiers' senior officer, "Serjeant Flood," went to the house after the shooting to express his regret. Sir Edward told Asquith that Moore was "probably a perfectly innocent person, and his being shot must be regarded as an accident. I have no doubt, however, that if the evidence were published there would be a demand that Flood should be tried for murder."

Legal advice given to the government in 1917, when Asquith had been replaced as Prime Minister by David Lloyd George, warned against publishing the proceedings of courtsmartial, many of which were held in camera in the days after the Rising when martial law had been declared. "There are one or two cases in which the evidence is extremely thin."

A legal official adds: "Nor do I think it would be wise if, for example, we were to publish the evidence in the case of Edmund Kent and we had to publish the fact that he summoned as one of his witnesses Thomas McDonagh, one of the leaders of the Easter Rising, and we had to state that Thomas McDonagh was not available as a witness as he was shot that morning."

Éamonn Ceannt was executed on May 8th, 1916."

British told not to take prisoners during Rising

From Rachel Donnelly, in London

"The shooting of unarmed civilians during the Easter Rising arose from British orders that soldiers should not take any prisoners, according to War Office files released at the Public Record Office in London yesterday.

A War Office document from June 1916, marked "very confidential", written by Sir Edward Troup, who was permanent secretary to the Home Department, for the British prime minister, Herbert Asquith, refers to several cases of civilians shot by British soldiers during the Easter Rising in Dublin.

The typed report is covered with handwritten corrections - sentences have been crossed out and rewritten - suggesting Sir Edward made a second draft of the report on the shootings, possibly after a request from Asquith, who was facing pressure from Irish politicians, such as John Dillon, to publish a detailed account of the Rising.

One case refers to the shootings of Peter Connolly, a member of the Redmondite Irish National Volunteers and the owner of a hardware shop; Thomas Hickey and his son, Christopher Hickey, aged 15, in North King Street on April 28th. They were "shot as rebels taken red-handed" and the British soldiers "had orders not to take prisoners, which they took to mean that they were to shoot anyone whom they believed to be an active rebel".

After this sentence several additions are made to the first draft of the report. The original script says: "Some of the persons were rightly shot, and that probably the others were not taking any active part, though the police evidence is clear that the whole of this street was a nest of Sinn Féiners." But additional notes provide more information so the sentence reads: "Some of the persons shot were probably fighting or sniping, but there can be little doubt that others were not taking any active part and, though the police evidence is clear that the whole of this street was a nest of Sinn Féiners, some were probably not even sympathisers."

And a handwritten note at the end of the document provides a revealing insight: "The source of the mischief was the military order to take no prisoners. This in itself may have been justifiable - but it should have been made clear that it did not mean that an unarmed rebel might be shot after he had been taken prisoner."

The next part of the sentence - "To kill an enemy who has surrendered without trial can't . . . " - has been crossed out and the sentence continues: "still less could it mean that a person taken on mere suspicion could be shot without trial." The second War Office file, registered on January 11th, 1917, details resistance to calls to publish transcripts of courtsmartial.

There were "161 Field General Courts-Martial" of civilians, with one referring to a non-commissioned officer and "22 General Courts-Martial" in connection with the Rising.

Asquith had given an undertaking to provide relatives of Irish "rebels" who had been shot with a copy of courts-martial proceedings, and when he was replaced as prime minister by David Lloyd George at the end of 1916 efforts were still being made to resist publishing details of the courts-martial.

Legal advisers to the government warned publication was unwise because several trials were held in camera and there was "no legal justification" for this under current legislation, "and in certain cases the evidence against Sinn Féiners who were killed was not too strong".



Copyright © 1995-2012 Clan Knowles™.   All rights reserved.   No text or images may be copied without written permission.   RMK Research  Questions or problems regarding this web site should be directed to Ronald Knowles or Séamus Ó Tnúthghail   March 20, 2012

Site sponsored by:  SMOGCHECK.COM™    and SmogTestOnly  and  TestOnlySmogCheck   and OrangeCountySmogCheck.Biz and AnaheimSmog.Biz and CostaMesaSmog.Biz and SantaAnaSmog.Biz and   WestminsterSmogCheck.Biz    and OCSmogCheck.Biz and Garden Grove Smog Check and SmogTest.Biz and Huntington Beach Smog Biz